Skip to content
Cogneros

The reasoning behind every risk you have written.

Underwriting positions, wordings and the reasoning behind prior decisions — retrievable in the language your people already use.

Request a Private Demo

Engagements typically start at $35,000, and scale with what you connect and where it runs.

Where insurance knowledge goes missing

An insurer's discipline lives in decisions it has already made. The exposure it declined and why. The endorsement added after a bad claim. The reasoning that made a marginal risk acceptable one year and not the next. Most of it is written down somewhere. Very little of it is findable by whoever is looking at the next submission.

So positions drift. Two underwriters reach different answers on the same exposure, both defensibly, because neither can see what the house has already decided. The cost of that turns up later, in a claim nobody priced for or a wording nobody meant to be using.

Search does not solve it. Full-text search finds documents mentioning a peril; it does not find the submission where the house took the opposite view and explained the reasoning. It also has no idea who is entitled to see which account.

Underwriters

Reach the house position on an exposure without booking time with the three colleagues who happened to be there.

Claims

Find the wording that actually applies, and the reasoning behind it, in the file rather than in somebody's memory.

Actuarial and portfolio

See where the book has and has not taken a view, before the aggregation shows up in a return.

Compliance

Stop reconstructing why a decision was made. The reasoning is retrievable, with the document it came from attached.

Three situations you will recognise

Not features. The specific moments in insurance work where the firm pays twice for thinking it has already done.

  1. 01

    A submission arrives for an exposure the house has seen before.

    Today

    The underwriter searches the system, gets forty documents, and asks the colleague who has been there longest. The answer depends on who was asked and what they remember.

    With Cogneros

    Ask in plain language. Cogneros returns the prior submissions in that class, what was decided in each, and the document and page the reasoning sits on — filtered to accounts that underwriter is entitled to see.

  2. 02

    A claim turns on which endorsement applied.

    Today

    Someone reconstructs the policy history by hand from the file, and the reconstruction is only ever as good as the filing was.

    With Cogneros

    The wording, the endorsements and the correspondence around them, each cited to its source, so the coverage position is checked against the documents before it is taken.

  3. 03

    A new underwriter is working out where the house draws a line.

    Today

    They learn it over a year, mostly from being corrected.

    With Cogneros

    They ask, and see what the house has actually done, with the reasoning attached. Consistency stops depending on tenure.

What goes in, and what comes back

Accounts carry more than documents: they carry the reasoning, the positions and the language your people have already stood behind.

Accounts contain

  • Underwriting guidelines and bulletins
  • Prior submissions and declinations
  • Policy wordings and endorsements
  • Claims files and coverage opinions

People actually ask

  • Have we written this class of risk before?
  • What did we decide on this exposure, and why?
  • Which wording did we use the last time this came up?

What changes

  • The house position reached in seconds, not meetings
  • New underwriters decide consistently sooner
  • Coverage positions checked before they are taken

What this means for insurance confidentiality

The general architecture is the same everywhere. These are the parts that matter specifically here.

Account-level entitlement
Underwriting files carry obligations to insureds and brokers. Access follows the account, mapped before indexing rather than discovered when somebody asks the wrong question.
Accountability after the fact
Which material informed a decision, and when, is logged and reviewable — which is what a conduct or reserving review actually asks you to produce.
Personal and medical material
Categories carrying personal or medical information are defined before anything is indexed, and can be excluded from the corpus or kept inside your own network entirely.

Security posture and data-handling terms are put in writing during evaluation, so your counsel reviews specifics rather than a marketing summary. How privacy is architected, and what to ask any vendor about confidentiality.

Where it runs is your call

Some organizations want the fastest path to capability. Others cannot let certain material leave the building. Cogneros is delivered all three ways, and the choice can differ by the kind of work.

  • Cloud

    Private tenancy, managed by Cogneros

    The fastest way to start. Your corpus is indexed into an environment dedicated to your organization, with access controlled by your own directory.

    Firms that want capability quickly without adding hardware.

  • Hybrid

    Cloud reasoning, sensitive work kept local

    Routine questions run in the cloud while defined categories of work stay on hardware inside your network. You set which is which, by matter, client, or role.

    Organizations with a subset of genuinely sensitive material.

  • On-premise

    An appliance in your own rack

    A managed Cogneros appliance is installed in your office or data centre and runs approved models locally, with egress restricted to what your policy allows.

    Work that cannot leave the building, for policy or contract.

Sensitive work does not have to become someone else’s training data. Which models may be used, by whom, and for which work is a policy you set — not a default we set for you.

Questions insurers and brokers ask

The ones that come up in nearly every evaluation in this industry, answered plainly.

Does this make underwriting decisions?

No. It finds what the house has already decided and shows the reasoning with its source attached. The decision, and the signature on it, stay with the underwriter. Retrieval and drafting are bounded deliberately: the system finds and composes, and it does not decide.

Our guidelines are in bulletins going back years, and some are superseded.

Then currency is the first thing worth establishing. Answers carry the document and its date, so age is visible rather than assumed, and which bulletins are authoritative is decided with you during the build for the lines where getting it wrong would matter.

Does it work for a broker as well as a carrier?

Yes. The material differs — submissions and market correspondence rather than guidelines and declinations — but the problem is the same one. The house has taken positions before, they were reasoned, and nobody can find them when the next one comes in.

What about personal data in claims files?

Which categories are indexed at all is a decision you make, written down during architecture rather than discovered later. Material carrying personal or medical information can be excluded from the corpus, or confined to hardware inside your own network so it never reaches an external model.

More general questions are answered on the main FAQ.

Cogneros for other businesses

The platform is the same everywhere. What changes is the vocabulary, the documents, and the questions your people already ask each other.

Not on the list? The platform does not care what industry you are in — only that your people have built up knowledge worth reaching. Talk to us about your business

Who would actually be running it

Cogneros is a product of The Raven Group — an independent infrastructure consultancy in Denver, Colorado, operating since 1993. The people who design your deployment are the people who keep it running afterwards.

Operating since 1993
33 years running the infrastructure small and mid-sized businesses depend on, through every platform shift in that time. Still independent, still in Denver.
Operators, not launchers
Websites, networks, servers and Apple fleets — designed, then run, and answered for long after the install. Private AI is the newest material, handled the same way.
Already in these rooms
TRG's clients are professional-services firms, law and compliance teams, healthcare providers and family offices — the same rooms Cogneros is built for.

Why there are no client logos here

We do not publish client names or case studies. The firms we work for did not engage us in order to become a reference — and how a vendor treats somebody else’s confidentiality is the most honest evidence you have of how it will treat yours.

The whole record is on The Raven Group’s own site, including the work that has nothing to do with AI.

Your business has already built the knowledge.

Cogneros makes it available to the people who need it — under your permissions, traced to your own documents.

What an engagement costs

Engagements typically start at $35,000.

Scope follows the repositories you connect and where the system runs — cloud, hybrid, and on-premise are priced differently.

Prefer to talk?
+1 303-351-1691
Based in
Denver, Colorado

We use this only to arrange your demonstration. No documents are shared at this stage.